In confidence case public notice
Return-path: <f.a.r.q@tangatawhenua.org>
Envelope-to: uk@tangatawhenua.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 06 May 2023 10:03:10 +1200
Received: from ip200172.carrie.web.mailx.hosts.net.nz.fpint ([192.168.200.172] helo=mailx.freeparking.co.nz)
by gavin.smtp.mailx.hosts.net.nz with esmtpa authed as tangatawhenua.org (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <f.a.r.q@tangatawhenua.org>)
id 1pv3W3-0002bS-IA; Sat, 06 May 2023 10:03:05 +1200
Received: from 43.245.52.184 (proxying for
2406:e003:176d:3601:2110:6614:baba:7545)
by mailx.hosts.net.nz with HTTP;
Sat, 6 May 2023 10:03:03 +1200
Message-ID: <0454f9031ce5380fc113ee9632438063.squirrel@mailx.hosts.net.nz>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 10:03:03 +1200
Subject: In confidence case to be public notice
From: "FARQuestions" <f.a.r.q@tangatawhenua.org>
To: mouldens@ps.gen.nz,
frank.bogaurt@hormail.com,
mkmvaneyk@gmail.com,
feez@xtra.co.nz,
Ivandenbogaart@gmail.com,
"Nonresident Settlor" <fordsongarry@gmail.com>,
lichfieldpoultryfarm@xtra.co.nz,
braymond@turners.co.nz,
anthonybogaart1@gmai.com,
kiwizim@gmail.com
Cc: "Far North" <law@tangatawhenua.org>,
"England LAW Office" <uk@tangatawhenua.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_20230506100303_21851"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Hosts-DKIM-Check: none
------=_20230506100303_21851
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: In confidence
From: "FARQuestions" <f.a.r.q@tangatawhenua.org>
Date: Fri, May 5, 2023 7:39 pm
To: "Trudy Moulden - mouldens@ps.gen.nz Francis van den Bogart -
frank.bogaurt@hormail.com Michael van Evk - mkmvaneyk@gmail.com Fiona
McDonald - feez@xtra.co.nz Megan van den Bogaart -
mvandenbogaart@rcclapac.com Luke van den Bogaart -
Ivandenbogaart@gmail.com Andrea van den Bogaart - feez@xtra.co.nz Gerard
van den Bogaart - fordsongarry@gmail.com Maria Paterson –
lichfieldpoultryfarm@xtra.co.nz Bernadette Raymond -
braymond@turners.co.nz Anthony van den Bogaart – anthonybogaart1@gmai.com
Cecelia van den Bogaart –" <kiwizim@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service by email
Breach of Trust, Meeting required with Gerry
Tracy for Gerry
f.a.r.q@tangatawhenua.org
Fiona McDonald - feez@xtra.co.nz
Megan van den Bogaart - mvandenbogaart@rcclapac.com
Luke van den Bogaart - Ivandenbogaart@gmail.com
Andrea van den Bogaart - feez@xtra.co.nz
Gerard van den Bogaart - fordsongarry@gmail.com
Maria Paterson – lichfieldpoultryfarm@xtra.co.nz
Bernadette Raymond - braymond@turners.co.nz
Anthony van den Bogaart – anthonybogaart1@gmai.com
Cecelia van den Bogaart – kiwizim@gmail.com
Trudy Moulden - mouldens@ps.gen.nz
Francis van den Bogart - frank.bogaurt@hormail.com
Michael van Evk - mkmvaneyk@gmail.com
5th May 2023
Dear Gerry’s Brothers and sisters and others
As the principal in this matter, We, Gerry, legal name “GERARD VAN DEN
BOGAART” now notice Trudy and Francis that this is a Cease and Desist
Order until this dispute is finalised with the stipulation that any
further contact from the known as Trudy Moulden and/or Francis van den
Bogaart and any one acting for these “trustees” “executors” will invoke
the fees contained in our schedule (see link); PPRS lien will be lodged
against the personal property of Trudy Moulden and/or Francis Van Den
Borgaart Our records reflect that Trudy Moulden and/or Francis van den
Borgaart Page 4 (5) of “DEED OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT” This deed will not
bind any of the parties to it until it has been signed by all the parties
and delivered to the executors. Chris Lynch has confirmed, again that
signatures with witness and initials on every page in not completed,
Chris Lynch has rejected Gerry bank details for the pay out from the 1
April 2018 “DEED OF FAMILY TRUST”
All beneficiaries and Trustees are accountable for wrongly attempting to
remove their brother and continuing the abuse by their sister Trudy
without any agreement(may god forgive your soul!)
DEED OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT (DOFA) is to be validated with all
beneficiaries signatures?!
Why the sum $313,342 is not paid to GERARD VAN DEN BOGAART the
inheritance from his father has been withheld until he signs this DOFA!
Where GERARD VAN DEN BOGAART 1/8 from the bank account as stated in Anna
Maria will?
Why is your math out as it is GERARD VAN DEN BOGAART is short (invoice
attach and TRUDY MOULDEN is in default)
This is why this man Gerry requested from the trustee Chris Lynch an full
audit (see attachments) on all the books to do with VAN DEN BOGAART
accounts, Trusts etc
Where is certified copy from the original 2021 “DEED OF FAMILY TRUST”
completed by all beneficiaries, as per Chris Lynch’s demands on Gerry?
The sum $305,981.00 from Wilhelmus estate Gerry where is this?
A full ledger entry audit “Certified Financial Statement” on all book and
all ingoing and outgoing entries, Beneficiaries, beneficial Owners and;
and customers (IRS Transcripts) on all VAN DEN BOGART Trusts and or deeds
and/or will
The attached “D” when did you respond to this Explain how does “DEED OF
FAMILY ARRANGEMENT” complies with the wishes of ANNA MARIA HENRICA VAN
DEN BOGAART
As the trustees, executors were given their rights it is inexcusable to be
ignoring their rights, as Trudy, Frank and Chris are accountable for your
decisions over the beneficiaries;
This is a failure in fiduciary in duties and the trustees and or executors
can terminated with full accountability to compensate for all the harm
they have caused to beneficiary Gerry for legal name GERARD VAN DEN
BOGAART for
Criminal breach of trust
• Obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception
• Contract may rescind it or treated as discharge for misrepresentation
• Force not permissible, In no case may force be used to secure compliance
with a direction
• Malicious prosecution
• Duty of agent to disclose pecuniary interest in contract
All beneficiaries will meet with Gerry within 5 days of this email a place
arranged by Gerry, The special conditions is for Gerry’s safety. As due
the records of this office, Trudy will not talk directly to Gerry if
required only through Tracy (his friend) Trudy and Frank have breached the
trespass order to further abuse your brother?! Any statement made by Trudy
or other now terminated executors will be with proof of claim, as well as
a “Certified Financial Statements”! It is unreasonable to continue the
“bulling and abusive behaviour by Trustees?
As the principal in this matter, we, Gerry, now notice Trudy and Frank
that this is a Cease and Desist Order until this dispute is finalised with
the stipulation that any further contact from you and/or its agents will
invoke the fees contained in our schedule (see link); PPSR lien will be
lodged against the personal property of Trudy and Frank
By: Tracy Lynch
For: GERARD VAN DEN BOGAART
CHRIS LYNCH
We thank CHRIS LYNCH for the undated correspondence which, We do not
understand. The correspondence is addressed to GERALD VAN DEN BOGAART but
the claim is that the 2021 DEED OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT is valid, which on
the face it would appear that someone is trying to make a fraudulent claim
for unsolicited goods and services [Cf] Fair Trading Act 1986 ss 21A(7)
and 21B(2), or enter Our property but unwilling to make a bona fide claim
as an injured party.
To clarify the situation would Chris Lynch, in his private capacity and
under full and unlimited commercial liability kindly respond to the
following questions to above within 14 days with the stipulation that
failure to respond is confirmed as tacit acceptance, silent acquiescence
and admission.
1. Is Chris Lynch via the Court an Agent of the Crown?
2. Are the Courts and Chris Lynch sworn to uphold and abide by New Zealand
Legislation & statute?
3. As all Acts bind the Crown are the Courts and Chris Lynch not bound to
uphold those Acts?
4. Is Chris Lynch, in breach with S.240 Crimes Act 1961 by obtaining by
deception and causing loss by deception without claim of right?
5. Should this dated 2021 “DEED OF FAMILY ARRANGEMENT” not be treated as
discharged for misrepresentation under S.40 Contract and Commercial Law
Act 2017 and s.381(2) Criminal Procedure Act 2011?
Notice We believe that this is a fraudulent claim for unjust enrichment as
there does not appear to be a sworn affidavit with claim of right to
substantiate the claim or full disclosure under s.5 Secret Commissions Act
1910 and do not believe that the evidence provided would satisfy all
elements of the charge or a plaintiff in this matter with a claim higher
than Our claim of right thereby voiding Jurisdiction ab initio.
In the interim this is a cease-and-desist order until this dispute is
finalized with the stipulation that any further contact will invoke the
fees contained in Our schedule. (Attached)
